{"id":"W2795283686","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2018.1424476","title":"“[M]ost plain, rational, and easie”: Rhetorical Disavowal in Early Eighteenth-Century Inoculation Pamphlets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Character (mathematics); Rhetorical device; Literature; Sociology; Media studies; History; Political science; Classics; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0157323,0.0003468106,0.0005018727,0.00239801,0.00292788,0.0053823,0.0007416744,0.002527352,0.001761042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02296099,0.0002426457,0.0002110985,0.001592774,0.01570208,0.004972276,0.002183262,0.004458047,0.0003075518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004015838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003405741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002001645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002255394,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892504,0.008500597,0.000256409,0.0003424303,0.00140134,0.0002489134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725587,0.02461988,0.001152448,0.0002710375,0.001153393,0.000244577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001339727,0.00004955902,0.0004731064,0.002702136,0.00003870335,0.0005556967,0.152712,0.0001231922,0.0009245093,0.7084963,0.03423572,0.09955519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004916818,0.00009960589,0.001628173,0.006676821,0.00004509052,0.000633463,0.02756011,0.0001544562,0.001173148,0.04336412,0.9185863,0.00002960213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06545489,0.5976561,0.003883444,0.2014464,0.006676924,0.00004664708,0.0000476873,0.00003888836,0.1247488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7777352,0.160353,0.001902014,0.042665,0.006185872,0.00008384361,0.00004081888,0.00005867327,0.01097561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0157323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08320135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03503555735466808,"score_gpt":0.3275623289446815,"score_spread":0.2925267715900134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}