{"id":"W2795613131","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-11103","title":"Can a Dynamic Risk Instrument Make Short-Term Predictions in \"Real Time\"? Developing a Framework for Testing Proximal Assessment of Offender Recidivism Risk During Re-entry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Predictive validity; Risk assessment; Psychology; Term (time); Statistics; Baseline (sea); Incremental validity; Dynamic assessment; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Test validity; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001121381,0.0003029236,0.0004763304,0.000365308,0.00063026,0.0001210817,0.0003169046,0.0004339212,0.0002043894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006890137,0.0003159832,0.0002354105,0.0004395299,0.00007018866,0.0001374105,0.00006825113,0.0006522278,0.000001309636],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001314519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001022668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01914678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1401998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971189,0.0002651082,0.0009356977,0.0005409647,0.0006180003,0.0005213311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982477,0.0002789507,0.0006606765,0.0002622477,0.0004112625,0.0001391422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001339893,0.001120478,0.8851899,0.001378512,0.0007615273,0.00001036357,0.03137173,0.0002799657,0.0004188751,0.007912465,0.0003365447,0.07108564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006504804,0.0002156035,0.9514254,0.003152951,0.0003062011,0.000001153603,0.03043959,0.004444349,0.0001017872,0.008637669,0.00005642408,0.0005683787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777887,0.0000350103,0.003999014,0.00009469202,0.0007733021,0.001624383,0.0004818802,0.0001201707,0.01508283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592769,0.000231111,0.03628644,0.000003978374,0.0001628272,0.0005581153,0.0006032625,0.00005043287,0.002826995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.121053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06941419684208253,"score_gpt":0.4073478736695867,"score_spread":0.3379336768275042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}