{"id":"W2796402730","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.046","title":"Is “Latin American” population-specific? Testing sex discriminant functions from the Mexican tibia on a Chilean sample","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forensic Science International","topic":"Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; University of Calgary","funders":"Universidad de Chile","keywords":"Discriminant function analysis; Population; Latin Americans; Forensic anthropology; Demography; Linear discriminant analysis; Biology; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Archaeology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002152271,0.0001376753,0.0001315984,0.00009824328,0.002086865,0.00009893484,0.0004254265,0.00001941029,0.002183228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003887562,0.00008371591,0.00005528063,0.0001515718,0.03838925,0.0001535455,0.0001775504,0.0001434353,0.0002008945],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006285593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003639893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03820235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04471257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998712,0.00002493702,0.0002095974,0.0003849086,0.0003915208,0.0002770249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986988,0.0005037046,0.0001403648,0.000231626,0.0003828632,0.00004263591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007391557,0.00005915,0.2475621,6.023276e-7,0.00008171608,0.000002272008,0.04143974,0.000004655728,0.00002457633,0.6086169,0.04903175,0.05310257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003771313,0.000992311,0.7007746,0.00006937375,0.00003925736,0.000007979163,0.1129041,0.003067541,0.0006126774,0.04692908,0.1337908,0.0004351754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393249,0.00001804224,0.0002603832,0.03134098,0.004461138,0.0001296661,0.0004566618,0.00007590296,0.02393229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926137,0.000004357643,0.0008996244,0.00279986,0.002283758,0.000008986923,0.00006561046,0.000007417299,0.001316702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5616878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0805642861065889,"score_gpt":0.3034789633352965,"score_spread":0.2229146772287076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}