{"id":"W2796635488","doi":"10.1109/cvprw.2018.00064","title":"Geometric Consistency for Self-Supervised End-to-End Visual Odometry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Vision and Imaging","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Compute Canada; Nvidia","keywords":"Visual odometry; Artificial intelligence; Odometry; Computer science; Deep learning; Ground truth; Computer vision; Leverage (statistics); Inertial measurement unit; Global Positioning System; Geometric transformation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Pipeline (software); Robot; Mobile robot; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001071622,0.001003754,0.0008881819,0.0005068719,0.0003899396,0.0008543289,0.002367315,0.001021168,0.002184957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005935777,0.0006938385,0.0005425207,0.00056948,0.001291866,0.001662859,0.002515828,0.001916251,0.0008395715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009582553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001389615,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00421721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007879714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992035,0.0001581977,0.00003627845,0.0002820895,0.0002245715,0.00009541205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981756,0.0004834181,0.0003180731,0.0006130009,0.0003186385,0.00009123079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002318306,0.0001362219,0.002181801,0.0001230082,0.00006165737,0.00006169019,0.0001501112,0.7264876,0.01993593,0.01232226,0.003330989,0.2349769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005783397,0.00003003638,0.0003204754,0.000005814554,0.000002544429,0.0000174139,0.00001052405,0.9899315,0.003929422,0.005301496,0.0004399927,0.000004921598],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01963508,0.00005605786,0.9771921,0.0001029413,0.00002027205,0.00002914857,0.00008954621,0.001958395,0.0009163665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7682642,0.00007305841,0.2274943,0.0001720335,0.00003791045,0.0001221821,0.0007093585,0.0003926524,0.002734194],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00421721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008385301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03108524117707117,"score_gpt":0.3283328860788092,"score_spread":0.297247644901738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}