{"id":"W2796721864","doi":"10.1525/cse.2017.000711","title":"Evaluating Risk After a Hazardous Waste Treatment Plant Released Persistent Organic Pollutants. Part 1. Background and Policy Issues","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Case Studies in the Environment","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Health Canada","keywords":"Hazardous waste; Risk assessment; Pollutant; Risk management; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Human health; Health risk; Subsidy; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Waste management; Business; Engineering; Medicine; Political science; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006677108,0.001105776,0.0003727668,0.002377436,0.003129303,0.005088808,0.002104809,0.004030602,0.002425776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01086289,0.0005263451,0.0004789681,0.002757935,0.002582455,0.002125633,0.001832148,0.00177092,0.0003156505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02516408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01609807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2377583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2962078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932248,0.002955826,0.0004342291,0.0002434746,0.002422503,0.0007191835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934105,0.003700123,0.001269523,0.0001115946,0.001278273,0.0002299991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001736274,0.006238593,0.3414155,0.006276029,0.0003585614,0.01178688,0.0362245,0.05971522,0.01058954,0.04725923,0.02873259,0.4496672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000212018,0.006854541,0.5335463,0.004305144,0.0005526349,0.003415015,0.2115317,0.01742723,0.02128591,0.03186895,0.1684912,0.0005093921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8239354,0.02469433,0.005565171,0.03760074,0.0002450542,0.003639116,0.00174513,0.0001125279,0.1024626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504707,0.02855795,0.005596832,0.002743053,0.0002451783,0.0009657104,0.0007141539,0.00001536192,0.01069115],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2377583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07868353337155738,"score_gpt":0.3695916152925589,"score_spread":0.2909080819210015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}