{"id":"W2797181623","doi":"10.22115/cepm.2018.122506.1014","title":"Flow and Pollutant Dispersion Model in a 2D Urban Street Canyons Using Computational Fluid Dynamics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Turbulence; Canyon; Meteorology; Computational fluid dynamics; Environmental science; Pollutant; Dispersion (optics); Mechanics; Dimensionless quantity; Turbulence modeling; Wind speed; Wind direction; Fluent; Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations; Geology; Physics; Geomorphology; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039864,0.0002105009,0.0003616725,0.0002104816,0.0003683757,0.0002722842,0.0007094393,0.00005768472,0.001603144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004870706,0.0001848435,0.00006136792,0.000497391,0.0003954315,0.001204057,0.001126905,0.0001648623,0.000007237727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002850106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004605165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002473142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002424774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983723,0.00007684734,0.000415222,0.0003538767,0.0004690432,0.0003127608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993677,0.00006996485,0.0002044514,0.0001635301,0.00003234816,0.0001620595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006423532,0.0001485594,0.8589418,0.00001329087,0.00004404276,0.00001547588,0.0006070632,0.1110512,0.016173,0.00003989149,0.004799725,0.008101699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002735282,0.000007814961,0.4070701,0.000113117,0.00001994925,0.000005083918,0.0001295732,0.5900171,0.0002998335,0.001775909,0.00009735375,0.000190615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942752,0.0009541381,0.002771083,0.0001613454,0.0001398556,0.0001954672,0.000111894,0.0000111081,0.001379927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965803,0.000519914,0.002547686,0.000172274,0.00007135312,0.000003886609,0.000006255812,0.00002032196,0.00007798189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4789659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1249075519022879,"score_gpt":0.46029170789581,"score_spread":0.3353841559935221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}