{"id":"W2797247500","doi":"10.20944/preprints201804.0179.v1","title":"Economic Diversity and the Resource Curse: A Dynamic Panel Model","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource curse; Diversity (politics); Curse; Economics; Panel data; Natural resource; Resource (disambiguation); Index (typography); Growth model; Natural resource economics; Panel analysis; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Ecology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001946608,0.0004744109,0.0009648769,0.0002150912,0.0007889784,0.00008871794,0.001334629,0.0004377456,0.0009051792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001293564,0.0004544075,0.0003401624,0.00005359555,0.0005585987,0.0001372173,0.01395007,0.0009005187,0.003573639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006240532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006833761,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009607482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008657477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968562,0.00004670523,0.00098353,0.001516022,0.00006169938,0.0005358514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997382,0.0001039396,0.0009078179,0.001391406,0.00002663601,0.0001881264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003756606,0.00006986014,0.9514607,0.0001749141,0.0006568658,0.000004950221,0.008875136,0.007669548,0.000002439786,0.02895077,0.00108857,0.0006705699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002660078,0.00001577861,0.4500429,0.0001032712,0.00007325585,0.00001349795,0.00021272,0.2583334,0.00002433652,0.235871,0.05136403,0.001285648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585968,0.001489642,0.0002149229,0.001887128,0.0007350037,0.0007128269,0.0002129845,0.00008614697,0.03606451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880174,0.001436382,0.0002304977,0.0005143295,0.0001632945,0.00008145813,0.00004085199,0.0000520116,0.009463796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5014178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1382347176906281,"score_gpt":0.2758020844241711,"score_spread":0.137567366733543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}