{"id":"W2797266498","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2017-0238","title":"Seismic fragility analysis of pre-1975 conventional concrete frame buildings in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Vulnerability assessment; Reinforced concrete; Structural engineering; Seismic analysis; Frame (networking); Vulnerability (computing); Probabilistic logic; Shear wall; Statistical analysis; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001875255,0.000474165,0.0002691449,0.002008505,0.001233547,0.0005474756,0.0007282954,0.0002196924,0.001128156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005824202,0.0002783625,0.0003151901,0.002228641,0.0006685643,0.0001541526,0.0003491131,0.000229078,0.0002030406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02433899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008944335,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995953,0.000009988666,0.000008532798,0.00003901211,0.0002090893,0.0001380124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995029,0.00004157537,0.00004070223,0.00001483219,0.0003346853,0.00006519798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007044809,0.0002025547,0.7152157,0.0001836499,0.0001102634,0.001437976,0.002828054,0.1829791,0.0256981,0.003379213,0.002393128,0.06486789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008647984,0.0001091378,0.9598488,0.00001952503,0.00002993674,0.0001126444,0.001252482,0.03268455,0.003461159,0.00009609751,0.002338463,0.00003856298],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965202,0.00004886868,0.0003019737,0.000009015192,6.705284e-7,0.00001111682,0.0008020986,0.00001590142,0.002290094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977851,0.00004985027,0.0003019041,0.000002556557,3.479319e-7,0.000004592687,0.0009044982,0.00000464313,0.0009465017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02433899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1765926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004595120422905458,"score_gpt":0.1798981975788737,"score_spread":0.1753030771559682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}