{"id":"W2797266498","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2017-0238","title":"Seismic fragility analysis of pre-1975 conventional concrete frame buildings in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Incremental Dynamic Analysis; Vulnerability assessment; Reinforced concrete; Structural engineering; Seismic analysis; Frame (networking); Vulnerability (computing); Probabilistic logic; Shear wall; Statistical analysis; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000269048,0.0001507539,0.0004815654,0.001083774,0.00002733242,0.00001686801,0.0002507199,0.00006427299,0.0004890352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006122987,0.0001671336,0.0001771409,0.001224557,0.00004197844,0.0001804677,0.000006887314,0.0002805842,0.000001170826],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006417107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001193523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6026691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987245,0.000009913604,0.0005995961,0.00009921689,0.0002162591,0.0003505675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991816,0.00004791166,0.0001090976,0.0001576597,0.000158637,0.0003450793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004008389,8.116035e-7,0.04955956,0.00004523967,0.0007884242,0.00002809898,0.0002032693,0.9475513,0.0008745024,0.00002071423,0.0007041024,0.0002199411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002122106,0.00001932139,0.06682461,0.0001082826,0.0002633509,0.00001408437,0.00005331945,0.9271775,0.001205432,0.00001113116,0.003936515,0.0001742624],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828905,0.0005934315,0.01562412,0.00003541277,0.000395971,0.00003069084,0.0000437416,0.000008890916,0.0003772031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.00002878138,0.0002031233,0.00006175144,0.0001175575,0.000001191517,0.000006238722,0.00001750839,0.00001269765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.372737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6815509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004595120422905458,"score_gpt":0.1798981975788737,"score_spread":0.1753030771559682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}