{"id":"W2797516570","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12991","title":"Seeing the woods through the saplings: Using wood density to assess the recovery of human‐modified Amazonian forests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; Norges Forskningsråd; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Lancaster University; Nature Conservancy; Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Banco Santander; Sight Research UK; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Amazonian; Amazon rainforest; Disturbance (geology); Secondary forest; Liana; Understory; Old-growth forest; Ecosystem; Ecology; Logging; Silviculture; Agroforestry; Salvage logging; Geography; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Biology; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001091189,0.00008573592,0.0001542037,0.000031749,0.0007872478,0.00003826409,0.0006087518,0.00005325719,0.0002912897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001390841,0.00004193411,0.0001003705,0.0002029348,0.0004231182,0.0001033672,0.0004712575,0.0001759382,0.00001722615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001475771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002625445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003485169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004076498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989759,0.0001873387,0.0002927483,0.0001114694,0.000237965,0.0001946163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990204,0.0002285304,0.000411895,0.0002429288,0.00005694643,0.00003932045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008257982,0.00009213331,0.9769999,0.000006812278,0.0001303201,0.00001150653,0.006136752,0.008368126,0.003988397,0.00009703234,0.00295185,0.001134571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002107904,0.0002588632,0.9906172,0.00001276917,0.00008537049,0.00003054069,0.001897971,0.0003645065,0.0005251571,0.001282658,0.004651447,0.00006273102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917737,0.00001401426,0.001259675,0.004491225,0.000386045,0.0001811942,8.828393e-7,0.000003142584,0.001890179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973015,0.000008412801,0.0004873585,0.001873331,0.0001857638,8.12144e-7,1.549504e-7,0.000004385364,0.0001382518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01361728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6054953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06293812144253098,"score_gpt":0.2904953766600151,"score_spread":0.2275572552174842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}