{"id":"W2797516570","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12991","title":"Seeing the woods through the saplings: Using wood density to assess the recovery of human‐modified Amazonian forests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Environment Research Council; Norges Forskningsråd; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Lancaster University; Nature Conservancy; Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Banco Santander; Sight Research UK; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Amazonian; Amazon rainforest; Disturbance (geology); Secondary forest; Liana; Understory; Old-growth forest; Ecosystem; Ecology; Logging; Silviculture; Agroforestry; Salvage logging; Geography; Environmental science; Forest ecology; Biology; Canopy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004376147,0.0001804045,0.0001628417,0.0007368873,0.0002526763,0.0003776064,0.0003158443,0.0001780348,0.0006840067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001395637,0.000115605,0.0001445829,0.0005319729,0.0003076046,0.0002983078,0.0003077381,0.0001723249,0.0000988249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001823004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009043557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007852738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02162533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998493,0.00004384394,0.00001567544,0.00003439159,0.00003166525,0.00002502239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.0002676644,0.0004702712,0.00008748203,0.0001371025,0.0001364439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004517663,0.00001922394,0.9958448,0.000009336827,0.00002142635,0.00001682791,0.0002151553,0.0001049045,0.001048201,0.000009368963,0.00002715497,0.002638384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.509245e-7,0.00001998072,0.9994726,0.000001353541,0.000002477686,0.00002626764,0.0001361524,0.0002047981,0.00008826767,0.000008071384,0.00003853827,0.000001064822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994977,0.00004560989,0.0001628781,0.000004852969,6.23075e-7,0.000004568409,0.0001299424,0.00000348965,0.0001503999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997371,0.00001301876,0.0001239887,0.000002091037,8.166675e-7,0.00000273646,0.0000836812,4.934978e-7,0.00003602789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007852738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01561403,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06293812144253098,"score_gpt":0.2904953766600151,"score_spread":0.2275572552174842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}