{"id":"W2797537566","doi":"10.1017/s0266462318000181","title":"ETHICS EVALUATION REVEALING DECISION-MAKER MOTIVES: A CASE OF NEONATAL SCREENING","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Indigenous Peoples' Health","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Relevance (law); Decision maker; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Decision analysis; Ethical decision; Cost–benefit analysis; Medicine; Genetic testing; Psychology; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Law; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06057932,0.0007835052,0.000943786,0.001986261,0.004074779,0.006239091,0.001110137,0.006517384,0.003757569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09979762,0.0003881669,0.00146483,0.001758246,0.009250022,0.004911545,0.003708058,0.00387816,0.0002320271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008638819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005851111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003049273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003067919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8862785,0.1026448,0.001757371,0.001376575,0.004834884,0.003107918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.826219,0.1597251,0.006262076,0.002238657,0.003677421,0.001877744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001032161,0.0006918663,0.02829863,0.001273012,0.0003378789,0.02990905,0.02946533,0.01765535,0.001165601,0.805019,0.004332484,0.08081955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003980128,0.0009186797,0.01337429,0.002700552,0.0005660723,0.02266558,0.06796191,0.06489559,0.004289435,0.7552024,0.0667477,0.0002797746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5654474,0.007124316,0.1710216,0.1017272,0.000491297,0.001201339,0.0002530972,0.00005023139,0.1526835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691623,0.0009192402,0.02616704,0.001691501,0.0001062153,0.0002957496,0.00002062859,0.00001084789,0.001626481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06057932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3203779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.274523916624873,"score_gpt":0.5526325943647324,"score_spread":0.2781086777398595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}