{"id":"W2798358939","doi":"10.1109/icit.2018.8352170","title":"Feedback linearization approach to fault tolerance for a micro quadrotor","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Rotor (electric); Robot; Fault tolerance; Computer science; Feedback linearization; Control engineering; Fault (geology); Control reconfiguration; Controller (irrigation); Linearization; Attitude control; Torque; Engineering; Control (management); Artificial intelligence; Nonlinear system; Embedded system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000110674,0.0003764787,0.0002613729,0.0001575222,0.0001883893,0.0002604714,0.000357369,0.0002649968,0.00166427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001997055,0.0001244688,0.0001951932,0.00009022617,0.0002891418,0.0002164805,0.0003038337,0.000360765,0.0002562215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002654423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002422446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002105997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001630174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999318,0.00001267953,0.000002942588,0.0000170596,0.00002563842,0.000009859978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999367,0.00001809884,0.00001678661,0.00000598862,0.00001933642,0.000003120922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121171,0.00006285853,0.0003967965,0.0002627339,0.00004318502,0.0003248152,0.0002891295,0.7752333,0.1072133,0.03052885,0.00188164,0.08364221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008958096,0.000161637,0.0001354156,0.000006655499,0.000006904328,0.00004978052,0.00001822321,0.9920483,0.004489443,0.001706396,0.001361671,0.000006611992],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02567369,0.0004263084,0.9678393,0.0001701488,0.00006148182,0.00003036474,0.00001738074,0.0003508611,0.005430393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562194,0.0003137222,0.03861612,0.00008559054,0.00004218021,0.00006020266,0.00002140792,0.00002127323,0.004620011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002105997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005567551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01819520600658768,"score_gpt":0.2396100671173789,"score_spread":0.2214148611107912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}