{"id":"W2798684040","doi":"10.1101/311290","title":"Beyond the traditional simulation design for evaluating type 1 error rate: from ‘theoretical’ to ‘empirical’ null","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Type I and type II errors; Null hypothesis; Null (SQL); Sample size determination; Statistics; Null model; Statistical power; Empirical research; Computer science; Statistical hypothesis testing; Variance (accounting); False discovery rate; Association (psychology); Mathematics; Econometrics; Data mining; Psychology; Biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3228299,0.001869917,0.003663919,0.002864864,0.001645923,0.005486714,0.003529653,0.00702462,0.007445567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6649103,0.001028076,0.00344287,0.002375478,0.01082747,0.005660512,0.004768286,0.009920361,0.001306784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00304425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00444805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008195829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003703733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4494623,0.4961653,0.01405027,0.0149803,0.02417153,0.001170374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1593245,0.7565302,0.02688259,0.03921285,0.01648079,0.001568928],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009579823,0.001057694,0.03878552,0.00359227,0.004688676,0.0008654484,0.003973541,0.1116997,0.006242741,0.5575226,0.01241514,0.2495769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002435295,0.00803706,0.0107543,0.002918935,0.001089988,0.0008338476,0.0008387842,0.4944872,0.01508159,0.4396231,0.02331774,0.0005821525],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02030733,0.000785483,0.9706455,0.001970138,0.0009026446,0.001539648,0.0002091992,0.0004741855,0.003165832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3594243,0.0004874661,0.6266115,0.002728586,0.0004159593,0.00870974,0.0002876674,0.0003385851,0.0009963055],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.67717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8350713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07729395552021567,"score_gpt":0.3281497998010382,"score_spread":0.2508558442808225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}