{"id":"W2799417209","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2012-0004","title":"METHODOLOGY OF THE ASSESSMENT OF THE ABRASIVE TOOL’S ACTIVE SURFACE USING LASER SCATTEROMETRY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Politechnika Koszalińska","keywords":"Abrasive; Grinding; Laser; Materials science; Surface roughness; Optics; Mechanical engineering; Light scattering; Bearing (navigation); Computer science; Scattering; Engineering; Metallurgy; Artificial intelligence; Composite material; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113152,0.0006430262,0.0005872958,0.002800687,0.0003237904,0.0008296786,0.0009874658,0.0005431328,0.001125498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001370378,0.0003661046,0.0003862935,0.00100792,0.0005810512,0.0004021765,0.0006852347,0.0006233494,0.0005661168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003813664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000904165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001080731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00134542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998484,0.0001594708,0.00006899548,0.0002452696,0.0009722729,0.00007006295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989869,0.0002029796,0.0001218922,0.000135665,0.0005133016,0.00003925303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006404785,0.00004846851,0.002008719,0.000415781,0.00002146636,0.0000722499,0.0003140409,0.00205301,0.9226367,0.001585152,0.0001702915,0.07061012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002440817,0.0006826213,0.01446402,0.00007474451,0.00005698417,0.0008356237,0.0003265725,0.03403471,0.9365806,0.001640706,0.01114978,0.0001292348],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.08810297,0.001107284,0.9071001,0.00005610161,0.00006861629,0.0005311641,0.0001929393,0.0008502068,0.001990632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3901948,0.001521875,0.6049877,0.00004286496,0.0000272631,0.000719326,0.0002459461,0.000107903,0.002152382],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002800687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005886972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05248884410046559,"score_gpt":0.2767367159217858,"score_spread":0.2242478718213202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}