{"id":"W2799506805","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23226","title":"A data‐based optimal setting method for the coking flue gas denitration process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Industrial Gas Emission Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Flue gas; Process (computing); Computer science; Process optimization; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Process engineering; Mathematics; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001129609,0.0001436695,0.0001741422,0.00008566576,0.0001555704,0.0001178848,0.0007403119,0.0001043021,0.0000254738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001127208,0.00009658892,0.00006785795,0.0001801003,0.0000418176,0.0001502455,0.00001223743,0.0004739218,0.000001275301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001606978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004321485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009027556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001074143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999006,0.00001750068,0.0003487331,0.00009553501,0.0001737726,0.0003584966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986213,0.0005736499,0.00008413804,0.0002703294,0.0002038223,0.0002467631],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003642393,0.000002422828,0.000009194954,0.00005608262,0.0001381958,0.00000941896,0.000415436,0.87238,0.1144252,0.0001095095,0.002920396,0.009497705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003816993,0.00001601332,0.000002223716,0.00008853777,0.00007115956,0.00006485774,0.00002355477,0.8552645,0.1379778,0.00002594863,0.005979436,0.0001042393],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07643726,0.0004730257,0.9175191,0.003457975,0.001314539,0.0005050116,0.00006762375,0.00008814895,0.00013733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794242,3.371654e-7,0.01840957,0.0001160646,0.001984761,0.000009962341,0.000005694414,0.00004424579,0.00000515065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3938782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02662305477667892,"score_gpt":0.2707112063613739,"score_spread":0.244088151584695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}