{"id":"W2799506805","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23226","title":"A data‐based optimal setting method for the coking flue gas denitration process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Industrial Gas Emission Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Flue gas; Process (computing); Computer science; Process optimization; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Process engineering; Mathematics; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001640792,0.0008100523,0.001027404,0.0008697589,0.0005399387,0.001119149,0.001282351,0.001011536,0.002103214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003183714,0.00058285,0.0008213424,0.0005356001,0.0006007903,0.001118748,0.0008546909,0.001073829,0.0002740413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009199726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001374877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006472459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003356934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992257,0.0002048114,0.00005532855,0.0001832772,0.0002683235,0.00006248868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991467,0.0003665512,0.00008156779,0.00004651428,0.0003246581,0.00003393083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005474752,0.00005697784,0.0004435448,0.00008024749,0.00002339595,0.00004338749,0.00007464347,0.9067031,0.004555077,0.005047856,0.0003024203,0.08261459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002944476,0.000008578289,0.00003496174,0.000001499156,0.000001958889,0.000003536419,0.000002832115,0.9989039,0.0004826809,0.0004496921,0.000104918,0.000002514078],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006146298,0.00004512713,0.9929538,0.00002870729,0.000007262176,0.00002570827,0.000007453532,0.0001367857,0.0006487465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5576075,0.0001125492,0.4400257,0.00004333954,0.00002027799,0.0002342143,0.00008301641,0.00009161323,0.001781757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006472459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0128696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02662305477667892,"score_gpt":0.2707112063613739,"score_spread":0.244088151584695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}