{"id":"W2799619410","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2017-0455","title":"Comparison of two depth-averaged numerical models for debris flow runout estimation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debris flow; Geology; Rheology; Landslide; Debris; Geotechnical engineering; Flow (mathematics); Computer simulation; Collision; Solver; Constitutive equation; Mechanics; Mathematics; Finite element method; Computer science; Engineering; Structural engineering; Physics; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009505452,0.0006159739,0.0005117067,0.0008294295,0.000261737,0.0009439713,0.0009743483,0.0007059688,0.0009585543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003847769,0.000314402,0.0004832029,0.0005992256,0.0002443896,0.000717109,0.0005622893,0.0005328524,0.0002329885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001037603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009667589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02230568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01411647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999678,0.00008103145,0.00003422212,0.00008669636,0.00008348567,0.00003648482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982399,0.0009098529,0.0001362546,0.0001796434,0.0004416491,0.0000927868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001470172,0.00008436448,0.01255397,0.00004158825,0.00004729143,0.00002833342,0.00007723807,0.9475519,0.002730408,0.00114013,0.0001829342,0.03541479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005768562,0.00001732473,0.001145118,0.000002588846,0.000005615926,0.000003989262,0.00001024641,0.9981037,0.000449657,0.0001457396,0.0001038129,0.000006345176],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7586641,0.0004664346,0.2322153,0.0001971721,0.0001275574,0.0001309241,0.0006579191,0.001630001,0.005910586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660856,0.000121434,0.03258456,0.00002395451,0.00001189144,0.00005257216,0.0002762242,0.00005767945,0.0007861566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02230568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0443517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02027710175534864,"score_gpt":0.2815504090336563,"score_spread":0.2612733072783077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}