{"id":"W2799988878","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2005-0006","title":"COMPARISON OF TWO AUTO-TUNING METHODS FOR A VARIABLE STIFFNESS VIBRATION ABSORBER","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Vibration; Dynamic Vibration Absorber; Robustness (evolution); Frequency response; Natural frequency; Control theory (sociology); Acoustics; Harmonic; Stiffness; Beam (structure); Computer science; Engineering; Structural engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005481063,0.0003483614,0.0004850326,0.0005614812,0.0002261582,0.0004395497,0.0007907494,0.0006916912,0.001530452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001225897,0.0002492715,0.0003286776,0.0002709169,0.0002449628,0.0004079929,0.0003524937,0.0003272023,0.0003865252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001971085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001939833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007688946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008496831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995759,0.00006803396,0.00002597458,0.0000869654,0.0002151632,0.00002792409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989403,0.0005527768,0.0001240075,0.0001709168,0.000185874,0.00002615671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008430564,0.0003960127,0.001294354,0.0006082937,0.0001197945,0.0001324116,0.0003067944,0.07900275,0.2706235,0.002764501,0.0008612894,0.6430473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001150698,0.0008418629,0.003241309,0.00002642641,0.0000855119,0.0004369897,0.0000515151,0.8728802,0.1162646,0.0006089697,0.005378376,0.00006921017],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1487717,0.001089448,0.8448337,0.00009122249,0.00007770852,0.00006525598,0.00002432916,0.001401898,0.003644657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.792481,0.0003424397,0.2029446,0.00006537521,0.00003565004,0.00007405369,0.00004697945,0.00009912711,0.003910829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001530452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005119801,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02188121233264398,"score_gpt":0.2916479135401137,"score_spread":0.2697667012074697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}