{"id":"W2800312371","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2018.1469271","title":"Legal traditions: A dialogue between comparative law and comparative legal history","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legal History","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Comparative law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Philosophy of law; Legal formalism; Legal opinion; Comparative history; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Legal culture; Normative; Sociology; Black letter law; Public law; Private law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006241031,0.0006541843,0.001410463,0.0002966297,0.001860733,0.0001451222,0.000688842,0.0001884653,0.001293024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004210629,0.0006761403,0.0002726539,0.0002896281,0.01047928,0.002089236,0.0001437134,0.0007547861,0.0006664403],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004128758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009330251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01584205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0555061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952518,0.001190728,0.0008217159,0.001001203,0.0009460206,0.0007885502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966938,0.000962887,0.0004823464,0.0003835105,0.001021798,0.0004556951],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001308087,0.000176099,0.000232361,0.000007644099,0.0002412135,0.00001181038,0.0740432,0.000002758741,0.0002116216,0.6518597,0.2730578,0.00002500618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008708123,0.0006138291,0.004477488,0.00006803963,0.0001075731,0.000007111353,0.00720282,0.00009113529,0.0004041323,0.001357534,0.984035,0.0007645906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.173522,0.008076772,0.0004138895,0.0007908378,0.002314284,0.0008370862,0.0001551525,0.000234306,0.8136557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712082,0.00007190601,0.0004253482,0.001407282,0.00253794,0.0001834557,0.0001032107,0.00002217463,0.02404055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2030431716791422,"score_gpt":0.3591367294318804,"score_spread":0.1560935577527382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}