{"id":"W2800519419","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.13171","title":"Quantifying ecological and social drivers of ecological surprise","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Waterloo; University of Regina","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Norges Forskningsråd; Dalhousie University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Surprise; Operationalization; Ecosystem management; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Ecological systems theory; Ecosystem; Resource management (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource management; Psychological intervention; Natural resource; Environmental science; Computer science; Psychology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005324156,0.00009195421,0.0003480662,0.00004250779,0.0001439808,0.00001023568,0.0002001107,0.0001782311,0.002638136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001326501,0.00006328218,0.00006137633,0.00008204424,0.0001756773,0.00008377861,0.0001730487,0.0001404313,0.0001135437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006279878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001412036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007480244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006373657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990549,0.00004401056,0.0003988901,0.0001391917,0.0001379801,0.0002250178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993196,0.0001308817,0.0004027207,0.00005680975,0.00002038915,0.00006961432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000579048,0.0006637059,0.9726218,0.00005490476,0.0001319338,0.00008094816,0.002564178,0.0002474017,0.01509483,0.001311023,0.003346543,0.003303668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008581713,0.0008257221,0.9917793,0.000003142649,0.00004418648,0.0000589474,0.0005549968,0.0002100779,0.0009999186,0.001268192,0.003286984,0.00011037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941611,0.000004912171,0.00001026883,0.0002587242,0.0002042848,0.00007487743,0.000001346941,0.000005884504,0.005278608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989566,0.00002474945,0.0005881214,0.0002590739,0.000159478,0.00000169848,4.595578e-7,0.000004589705,0.000005197372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01915747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02127319470980892,"score_gpt":0.24640502011365,"score_spread":0.2251318254038411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}