{"id":"W2800574852","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.267","title":"Pharmaceutically active compounds in the Xiangjiang River, China: Distribution pattern, source apportionment, and risk assessment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Apportionment; China; Distribution (mathematics); Risk assessment; Environmental science; Geography; Archaeology; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006066149,0.0003709182,0.0002908189,0.002805232,0.000479653,0.0008534807,0.0004407144,0.0004573249,0.0006328446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004734938,0.0002734308,0.0004433663,0.003017943,0.0003708752,0.0004674523,0.00058782,0.0001909171,0.00008136182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001414011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001686409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07058302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06796076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996717,0.00004784406,0.00004030926,0.00007182189,0.0001141341,0.00005420817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995499,0.00007749302,0.0001661785,0.00002622219,0.0001425735,0.00003745567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001851409,0.00005036534,0.9616305,0.0001233699,0.0001555802,0.0005671642,0.0007491846,0.002734121,0.007814296,0.0005435639,0.0003187452,0.02512787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102701,0.00009769535,0.9900187,0.00001950332,0.0001045148,0.0002893141,0.0006619643,0.004909398,0.001617486,0.0003146764,0.001940048,0.00001637268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977077,0.0004960586,0.0004315623,0.00006339239,0.000002530318,0.00001353948,0.0007596752,0.00001136402,0.0005141826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980509,0.0004555536,0.0003101345,0.00001935682,0.000004431935,0.000008104006,0.0004730214,0.000002813994,0.0006757415],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07058302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1403444,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01559570822929243,"score_gpt":0.2812031053811094,"score_spread":0.265607397151817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}