{"id":"W2800574937","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0196851","title":"Opening the file drawer: Unexpected insights from a chytrid infection experiment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Coinfection; Amphibian; Wildlife disease; Host (biology); Pathogen; Genotype; Genotyping; Bullfrog; Zoology; Immune system; Inoculation; Disease; Ranavirus; Species complex; Wildlife; Virology; Ecology; Microbiology; Immunology; Genetics; Virus; Pathology; Gene; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01130471,0.001167351,0.001449453,0.002116805,0.001512393,0.002270278,0.002308875,0.002604354,0.04996864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05535688,0.0005998268,0.00117344,0.001205861,0.001535218,0.003374015,0.003213286,0.002415211,0.01334296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008894437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001176124,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005298285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001492352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943799,0.001516447,0.0004858671,0.0008707914,0.002456379,0.0002906049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8750361,0.08949379,0.006587736,0.01442572,0.0109732,0.003483391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003552395,0.001367276,0.02019991,0.002691976,0.0003447414,0.004506052,0.00463105,0.001750796,0.06463916,0.0058316,0.6735027,0.2169822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001170602,0.004050394,0.05711157,0.001720548,0.0004127408,0.003899629,0.00223792,0.01989575,0.1120521,0.02879368,0.7679609,0.0006941822],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1748241,0.002163385,0.3977509,0.03708512,0.01584001,0.005237581,0.1554976,0.1595051,0.05209627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3376071,0.001363204,0.4791428,0.01833072,0.003799578,0.01245269,0.05142085,0.04113086,0.0547523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1671618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02595294496737945,"score_gpt":0.2160254363016005,"score_spread":0.190072491334221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}