{"id":"W2801141826","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2001-0014","title":"PREDICTION AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE MULTIAXIAL FATIGUE FAILURE OF ADVANCED COMPOSITes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Goodman relation; Materials science; Structural engineering; Fatigue testing; Stress (linguistics); Cyclic stress; Material failure theory; Composite material; Stress concentration; Fracture mechanics; Engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001135663,0.0006602454,0.0002818099,0.000371389,0.0003859017,0.0002092619,0.0005375781,0.0008835937,0.001262499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002098151,0.0002356228,0.0002123586,0.0002455642,0.0004980799,0.0006416619,0.0003530042,0.000525654,0.0003384268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002733328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000196685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001187485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002011933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995202,0.00007080416,0.0000203448,0.00008416802,0.0002569989,0.00004742102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983497,0.0005198678,0.000216827,0.0002095271,0.0006206817,0.00008341896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003753038,0.001214447,0.01033058,0.0001603226,0.00002450664,0.0001089466,0.0002562216,0.06719708,0.8923466,0.0004386715,0.0003206636,0.0272268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003894414,0.006762459,0.02124917,0.00002068411,0.00003211684,0.0001494812,0.00009913469,0.3203811,0.649726,0.0002681601,0.001221873,0.00005070021],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823694,0.000209164,0.01626065,0.00002420623,0.00001377409,0.00003847662,0.0001394466,0.0001342409,0.0008106289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938148,0.0001254209,0.005313478,0.000004122698,0.000004634845,0.00005141804,0.0001434093,0.00001333925,0.0005293816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001262499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006006002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02243421064509245,"score_gpt":0.2395926075531545,"score_spread":0.217158396908062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}