{"id":"W2801400898","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008018","title":"An Overview of International Fisheries Disputes and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Fishing; International law; Fishery; Fisheries management; Law; Law of the sea; Political science; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Dispute board; Dispute mechanism; International waters; Business; Public international law; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002260818,0.0006384185,0.0006091346,0.01348333,0.00393902,0.009952493,0.000970754,0.003174938,0.006168421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00254736,0.0004118705,0.000558931,0.02332955,0.005196522,0.007374438,0.001885459,0.003658835,0.0009890613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01115231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008430726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0547455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07419243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974985,0.0006778888,0.0002456424,0.000121051,0.001037265,0.0004196932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976731,0.001358883,0.0002116384,0.00007280457,0.0004919249,0.0001916792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001599957,0.00009596847,0.001915498,0.001202899,0.00001331371,0.0004643394,0.005341824,0.0005637374,0.0001875031,0.7194566,0.1214574,0.1492849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001755877,0.00001136319,0.002212949,0.001142372,0.000004695641,0.0002228239,0.002342609,0.0001068117,0.00002732026,0.02569677,0.9682201,0.00001048751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003286622,0.6640704,0.001356585,0.01529687,0.001773293,0.0000345697,0.0001057819,0.0000255813,0.3140503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05868169,0.8969912,0.001902239,0.005281928,0.004431922,0.00007421537,0.0003922629,0.00004017986,0.03220437],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1088537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009673943193504642,"score_gpt":0.2274684346098876,"score_spread":0.217794491416383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}