{"id":"W2801500177","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2012-0028","title":"INVESTIGATION OF HYBRID AND DIFFERENT CROSS-SECTION COMPOSITE DISC SPRINGS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deflection (physics); Composite number; Finite element method; Epoxy; Structural engineering; Materials science; Leaf spring; Composite material; Spring (device); Cross section (physics); Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003361628,0.0001491077,0.0002045048,0.00008381192,0.0001553991,0.00002316227,0.0001340101,0.00009218568,0.00001429328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002978047,0.0001354596,0.0002639146,0.0002167286,0.00003164638,0.0001503959,0.00001043029,0.000254912,1.679036e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002491827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003538051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001161423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003256402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990504,0.00001354042,0.000311216,0.0001148304,0.0001678006,0.0003422088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993068,0.0001416156,0.0000337202,0.0001918172,0.00005099808,0.0002750675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003440766,0.000008635415,0.00007053222,0.0004205434,0.000151297,3.474468e-8,0.0001560861,0.7590151,0.2377068,0.001894936,0.000008547079,0.0005640776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001755541,0.00001776587,0.0002466119,0.00004776123,0.00005134781,0.000003754448,0.0000145977,0.7590409,0.2400983,0.00006142445,0.0001370278,0.0001049265],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2166828,0.00009210686,0.7824714,0.00003618718,0.0003409879,0.0002408157,0.00008322631,0.00004819873,0.000004205397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542959,0.00001854728,0.04552747,0.000009477617,0.00005789169,0.00003525565,0.000006733816,0.00003588454,0.00001284426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7376131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03019398423699657,"score_gpt":0.2665867087530751,"score_spread":0.2363927245160785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}