{"id":"W2801505407","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2013-0050","title":"EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL AND FINITE ELEMENT MODELING ON PIEZOELECTRIC CANTILEVER BIMORPH ENERGY HARVESTER","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bimorph; Finite element method; Cantilever; Piezoelectricity; Energy harvesting; Electric potential energy; Energy (signal processing); Mechanical engineering; Power (physics); Engineering; Acoustics; Structural engineering; Electrical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003623768,0.0001346845,0.0001650507,0.0001286557,0.00007640253,0.00001954212,0.0001556572,0.0001342844,0.0000203853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001046757,0.0001210822,0.0001641648,0.0003972888,0.00002895184,0.0001229441,0.000005702102,0.0001763391,2.544438e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003347284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001033963,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005232565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003467015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991005,0.00001054661,0.0002573157,0.0001272981,0.0002513699,0.0002529891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993842,0.00008654581,0.00002830995,0.0002082321,0.0002231749,0.00006948507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[6.886814e-7,0.000005760053,0.000001479099,0.00003832819,0.0001444657,2.29625e-8,0.0000246456,0.9781193,0.002260186,0.01148347,0.00006248224,0.007859136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000214415,0.0000294577,0.00002866724,0.00004923545,0.0001101277,7.816682e-7,0.00002741238,0.9830669,0.01535366,0.0008882832,0.0001154752,0.0001155708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08648396,0.00007096904,0.912674,0.0001904331,0.0001532961,0.0002532296,0.00003435159,0.00008914245,0.00005067484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932216,0.00001387531,0.006555248,0.00003263529,0.00001375158,0.0001031166,0.000002760079,0.0000292703,0.0000277486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7910107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0271348239371679,"score_gpt":0.218578345168219,"score_spread":0.1914435212310511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}