{"id":"W2801626634","doi":"10.29007/sxfq","title":"Women in the Shadow of Big Men: The Case of Canada Excellence Research Chairs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"EasyChair preprint","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Government (linguistics); Citation; Political science; Shadow (psychology); Library science; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Citation impact; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01293827,0.0004894424,0.001011821,0.004340347,0.04464684,0.01558987,0.002077916,0.003572315,0.008714675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02787245,0.0004839171,0.0005773604,0.008308306,0.01810724,0.004985649,0.008967443,0.004211155,0.0007159618],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05954614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1045983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.884951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9361263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9797606,0.005096002,0.0003453857,0.001506375,0.005349614,0.007941996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630045,0.01029703,0.003672318,0.001402614,0.005526558,0.01609699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003134158,0.00009105998,0.1045578,0.000277646,0.000091038,0.007945779,0.5652636,0.0002422542,0.000666008,0.210232,0.04845186,0.06186757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007949634,0.00005135715,0.06521683,0.0008465958,0.0001051248,0.001333663,0.6575525,0.0004628729,0.0004222327,0.02203224,0.2517669,0.0001301729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5814155,0.008789988,0.001380851,0.1751895,0.0009951009,0.0001740901,0.0004176491,0.00004568145,0.2315916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748325,0.002280926,0.0003385824,0.007645777,0.0001810099,0.00003328563,0.00006194355,0.00003930746,0.01458656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4320395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5901366365887122,"score_gpt":0.5595273375253721,"score_spread":0.03060929906334009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}