{"id":"W2801728581","doi":"10.1080/10875549.2018.1460736","title":"Measuring economic exclusion for racialized minorities, immigrants and women in Canada: results from 2000 and 2010","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Immigration; Disadvantage; Precarity; Social exclusion; Demographic economics; Race (biology); Economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Inequality; Ethnic group; Sociology; Labour economics; Political science; Economic growth; Gender studies","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001620886,0.000516774,0.0005371112,0.004139984,0.005101725,0.002070246,0.00136821,0.0005336844,0.001326539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004196535,0.0003212861,0.001045273,0.008197732,0.001012901,0.0006967096,0.002773494,0.001271786,0.0003652431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0357606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04177391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986069,0.00005918095,0.00009336317,0.000111871,0.0006315507,0.0004973124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950308,0.0001624852,0.00075957,0.00007605888,0.002748378,0.001222646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009584834,0.00008150827,0.9816085,0.00006955761,0.00006456795,0.00003828455,0.002272897,0.0001390692,0.00007055225,0.000115989,0.003383061,0.01206018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002656043,0.00001245976,0.9952607,0.00004031614,0.00001559985,0.00001072626,0.002678199,0.00008337605,0.00005761609,0.00001483854,0.001813944,0.000009735445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722114,0.001662793,0.0001623352,0.0007910593,0.00004561801,0.0001313545,0.01836935,0.00002196348,0.006604136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976877,0.002185929,0.0004584111,0.0004272271,0.0000234684,0.0001112,0.01574198,0.00002043085,0.004154374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0357606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2594625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05142104970981103,"score_gpt":0.3198125589770555,"score_spread":0.2683915092672444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}