{"id":"W2801791698","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2005-0020","title":"THE SELF-DAMPING CHARACTERISTICS OF A MAGNETIC CONSTRAINED FULLY COVERED SANDWICH CANTILEVER BEAM","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Vibration and Dynamic Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Constrained-layer damping; Beam (structure); Magnetic damping; Vibration; Materials science; Displacement (psychology); Rayleigh–Ritz method; Structural engineering; Transverse plane; Modal analysis; Mechanics; Acoustics; Physics; Engineering; Vibration control","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001785142,0.0001950616,0.0001785746,0.0001894028,0.0001001759,0.000168744,0.0002748056,0.0003083807,0.001106299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003319185,0.0001196758,0.0001660166,0.00009861206,0.0002179696,0.0002082082,0.0001764494,0.0001518091,0.0001867405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008221899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009282264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003559284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004924928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999317,0.00001002481,0.000002026614,0.00001072712,0.00003885637,0.000006702331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997975,0.00008974467,0.00002863489,0.00002656724,0.00004337116,0.00001423618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002127606,0.00003890057,0.002801637,0.0001079395,0.00003758146,0.000256965,0.0003756901,0.03866602,0.9341666,0.003329303,0.0002317384,0.01977478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002189206,0.000393206,0.01063285,0.00001661244,0.00001794497,0.00041909,0.0001175277,0.8899301,0.09634237,0.0008758768,0.001200966,0.00003149885],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9018734,0.0002014063,0.09477966,0.0000397557,0.00001233514,0.0000138111,0.00006086199,0.0001266853,0.002891991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909032,0.00005761609,0.007903559,0.000007884395,0.00000270182,0.00001321784,0.00003784184,0.000009653191,0.001064252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001106299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003700912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004455087610968252,"score_gpt":0.1738422051891405,"score_spread":0.1693871175781722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}