{"id":"W2801791698","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2005-0020","title":"THE SELF-DAMPING CHARACTERISTICS OF A MAGNETIC CONSTRAINED FULLY COVERED SANDWICH CANTILEVER BEAM","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Vibration and Dynamic Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cantilever; Constrained-layer damping; Beam (structure); Magnetic damping; Vibration; Materials science; Displacement (psychology); Rayleigh–Ritz method; Structural engineering; Transverse plane; Modal analysis; Mechanics; Acoustics; Physics; Engineering; Vibration control","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000158583,0.0001293589,0.0001995132,0.0000377273,0.0002034006,0.00002249795,0.0002203444,0.0001128463,0.00005003284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002410157,0.0001062,0.0004655031,0.0002426316,0.00004090227,0.00005911483,0.000003632764,0.0001748053,8.84044e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002241757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001755114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007435423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01112867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991672,0.000005677391,0.0003374583,0.00009440279,0.0001310809,0.0002641614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994247,0.0001053654,0.00004360794,0.0002281868,0.00006865397,0.0001295136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000858891,0.0000260022,0.00000909732,0.0002772663,0.0008094351,2.150572e-7,0.0006374256,0.9684302,0.01555014,0.00366705,0.0003898201,0.01019471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002806367,0.00001788422,0.0001017133,0.00002818893,0.0001754886,0.000003365411,0.00009744886,0.9911346,0.003824002,0.0000242493,0.004187317,0.000125054],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02632545,0.0002086199,0.9707837,0.0009130451,0.0004878681,0.0004918085,0.0004989558,0.0001618459,0.0001287448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928409,0.00006309781,0.006839997,0.00005541598,0.00004084926,0.00002462102,0.000006883995,0.00002748581,0.000100695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6210062,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004455087610968252,"score_gpt":0.1738422051891405,"score_spread":0.1693871175781722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}