{"id":"W2801819274","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2010-0005","title":"DETERMINATION OF THE ANALYTICAL WORKSPACE BOUNDARIES OF A NOVEL 2-DOF PLANAR TENSEGRITY MECHANISM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Workspace; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Kinematics; Payload (computing); Inertia; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Simple (philosophy); Kinematic chain; Control engineering; Topology (electrical circuits); Classical mechanics; Engineering; Structural engineering; Physics; Robot; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000318786,0.0003881334,0.0003657781,0.0004354857,0.0001800601,0.0005283827,0.0007091857,0.0006742789,0.001483015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008476223,0.0002524574,0.0003101335,0.0001531419,0.0004768142,0.0004976831,0.0005989016,0.0002985135,0.0003104524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001482191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003647662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001446262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000146148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998966,0.00001758132,0.000005945457,0.00001943289,0.00004446816,0.00001586372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998214,0.00006593356,0.00004458906,0.00002704058,0.00002807979,0.00001301477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001811725,0.00006525552,0.001228402,0.0003524008,0.00002809792,0.0009427893,0.0003616206,0.5365046,0.2687276,0.1241054,0.0007109913,0.06679177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004928383,0.000207108,0.0008178256,0.00006844366,0.00001303898,0.0007768439,0.00008428869,0.9497083,0.02593931,0.01613405,0.006153079,0.00004855568],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1084428,0.0004621229,0.8798043,0.00008138533,0.00002212999,0.00005043244,0.00004927719,0.0002102003,0.0108774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169466,0.0003910218,0.179397,0.0000195687,0.0000113568,0.0001419281,0.0000555907,0.00002993096,0.003006838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001483015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004961193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008641628744117858,"score_gpt":0.1961832353553775,"score_spread":0.1875416066112596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}