{"id":"W2801819274","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2010-0005","title":"DETERMINATION OF THE ANALYTICAL WORKSPACE BOUNDARIES OF A NOVEL 2-DOF PLANAR TENSEGRITY MECHANISM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Workspace; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Kinematics; Payload (computing); Inertia; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Simple (philosophy); Kinematic chain; Control engineering; Topology (electrical circuits); Classical mechanics; Engineering; Structural engineering; Physics; Robot; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001379086,0.0001090952,0.0002000794,0.0000435065,0.0001569884,0.00001607054,0.0002415064,0.0001691099,0.00001934218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005643426,0.00007917183,0.000536484,0.0003592601,0.0000811544,0.00006135097,0.000004476414,0.0002739953,4.939794e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008346621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009831198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002083574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02311044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993225,0.000003895987,0.0002575592,0.00009025694,0.0001573188,0.0001684103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999459,0.00006281342,0.00005644856,0.000242906,0.0001006384,0.00007823805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001002741,0.00003562571,0.00001836,0.0004131774,0.0004763226,8.469375e-8,0.0007253192,0.6509533,0.2391256,0.1062186,0.00009061167,0.001933019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001880699,0.00001106513,0.0001537309,0.00003225786,0.0001785495,0.000002825481,0.00005948548,0.9452525,0.05336665,0.0004928993,0.0001737141,0.00008821901],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0554463,0.00001696615,0.9431086,0.0003779118,0.0005900445,0.0002372436,0.0001786096,0.00002787797,0.00001648288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496133,0.000004083565,0.0502945,0.00001365151,0.00002049635,0.000007964133,0.000002948539,0.00001706711,0.00002600642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947153,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008641628744117858,"score_gpt":0.1961832353553775,"score_spread":0.1875416066112596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}