{"id":"W2801833168","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2015-0050","title":"ON THE HYBRID-DRIVEN LINKAGE MECHANISM WITH ONE INPUT CYCLE CORRESPONDING TO TWO OUTPUT CYCLES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Linkage (software); Kinematics; Link (geometry); Mechanism (biology); Reciprocating motion; Trajectory; Four-bar linkage; Computer science; Constant (computer programming); Angular velocity; Mathematics; Motion (physics); Physics; Classical mechanics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002748912,0.0003358268,0.0002717903,0.0004051661,0.0002717276,0.0002850827,0.0008218173,0.0003920909,0.00255108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002233825,0.0002064705,0.0003872819,0.00030657,0.0003202305,0.0004304939,0.0004824251,0.0001956167,0.0003350679],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001505677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002506894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002923417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000297521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998434,0.00002394891,0.00001079907,0.00003960191,0.0000649635,0.00001730338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998971,0.00002039312,0.00002907488,0.00002075229,0.00002275635,0.000009881247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005558053,0.0001044668,0.0009916412,0.0006476327,0.00009246106,0.0009678674,0.0001872323,0.1521114,0.5933942,0.08468831,0.0007932956,0.1654656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001630105,0.002981178,0.00339725,0.0001179102,0.000125468,0.001746479,0.00007845894,0.8259761,0.1239662,0.01826538,0.02300495,0.0001777027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2640291,0.0006990211,0.7183378,0.000096696,0.0001372022,0.0001767241,0.00009108385,0.0007378921,0.01569435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032112,0.0002639213,0.09175725,0.00003119277,0.00001760529,0.0001065146,0.00005280657,0.00001558029,0.004543862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00255108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008534193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01848418061080706,"score_gpt":0.2054881968025488,"score_spread":0.1870040161917418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}