{"id":"W2801873872","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1491","title":"Workforce Scheduling in Administrative Operations: A Case Study in Accounting","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Overtime; Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Operations research; Workforce; Set (abstract data type); Task (project management); Time horizon; Operations management; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Labour economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0227566,0.0003906108,0.0006726822,0.003208271,0.002939366,0.002250347,0.00189721,0.0001808691,0.000210243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01618629,0.0003476037,0.0001636355,0.009223158,0.006340852,0.002767568,0.0000453841,0.0006764461,0.00002177459],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0207324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03694288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932476,0.001032971,0.002304912,0.001041773,0.0007954111,0.001577276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942628,0.001467883,0.0008725502,0.0004345386,0.001558225,0.00140403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001037618,0.0004444948,0.7968763,0.00001569856,0.0000360076,0.01604888,0.128209,0.0343992,0.0002748152,0.01751935,0.00005508384,0.006017414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001826653,0.01627719,0.1022281,0.0007912965,0.00007258585,0.03165948,0.7161184,0.09284721,0.000717671,0.03583157,0.0003927577,0.001237043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914894,0.0002435947,0.00179377,0.00106619,0.0007768347,0.0005034868,0.00002680658,0.00001123257,0.00408867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978765,0.000004718883,0.0205133,0.0001595805,0.000354039,0.0000226161,0.000001373188,0.00001385538,0.0001655028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3357834813927588,"score_gpt":0.4508407410063512,"score_spread":0.1150572596135924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}