{"id":"W2801967452","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2013-0024","title":"GENETIC-ALGORITHM-BASED MIX PROPORTION DESIGN METHOD FOR RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Slump; Carbonation; Genetic algorithm; Durability; Cement; Residual; Structural engineering; Materials science; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Process engineering; Composite material; Mathematics; Engineering; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002644152,0.0002509666,0.0002975346,0.00007304081,0.0002145668,0.00004334733,0.0003426338,0.0002525081,0.00004759594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003537055,0.0002334751,0.0006634954,0.0002941317,0.00003327475,0.0001513423,0.000003506312,0.0002263361,0.000002392728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004278674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001874945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002947448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005647434,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986461,0.00001695032,0.0004075698,0.000225878,0.0001626801,0.0005408259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989271,0.0002118811,0.00006850738,0.0003514379,0.0001606297,0.000280493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001241449,0.000003481965,6.157978e-7,0.0004167873,0.0003383126,2.951774e-7,0.000107286,0.8480638,0.06941731,0.0002295165,0.0009200278,0.08049014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005300394,0.00006347327,0.000008065561,0.00007201856,0.0001020063,0.00000480816,0.00001560791,0.8548337,0.1418002,0.000230287,0.002100922,0.0002388636],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00170137,0.0001737743,0.9952402,0.0003329741,0.0005636701,0.001644209,0.0001384923,0.0001970977,0.000008215912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1810222,0.00003496285,0.8175354,0.00008657941,0.00007618878,0.001063078,0.00001002123,0.0001052242,0.00006633808],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1793209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9520839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01233263475356009,"score_gpt":0.2103261083790011,"score_spread":0.197993473625441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}