{"id":"W2801967452","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2013-0024","title":"GENETIC-ALGORITHM-BASED MIX PROPORTION DESIGN METHOD FOR RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Slump; Carbonation; Genetic algorithm; Durability; Cement; Residual; Structural engineering; Materials science; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Process engineering; Composite material; Mathematics; Engineering; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006627103,0.0006694456,0.0006346104,0.0006328495,0.0002752117,0.0004353213,0.0008267112,0.0007921061,0.001474538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008758118,0.0003984006,0.0005575805,0.000404575,0.0004848683,0.0003533674,0.0004521167,0.0004688686,0.0001895259],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006640073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001199163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003676543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004588753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997569,0.00006899943,0.00001101171,0.00004761612,0.00009402079,0.00002148891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999795,0.00008789841,0.00003111122,0.000009636262,0.00006526103,0.0000110572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617863,0.00003228713,0.0002888499,0.00004879174,0.00003080442,0.00003204369,0.00003866777,0.945694,0.005869206,0.003329958,0.0002429035,0.04435632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001365907,0.00002571054,0.00005940699,0.000003232893,0.000007709675,0.00000878933,0.000003730364,0.9981036,0.0008334215,0.0005067792,0.0004304469,0.000003535288],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01389391,0.0000888854,0.9840906,0.00003810713,0.00001538952,0.00005453432,0.00001247366,0.0001819408,0.001624252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3154846,0.0001505004,0.6806577,0.00006290361,0.0000163365,0.0003705921,0.00005120326,0.0000587914,0.003147399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003676543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007310271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01233263475356009,"score_gpt":0.2103261083790011,"score_spread":0.197993473625441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}