{"id":"W2802153528","doi":"10.5931/djim.v14i0.7872","title":"Peering into the Private Lives of Judges: Reconciling Judicial Accountability and Privacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Diversity (politics); Public interest; Judicial review; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03030819,0.0004112459,0.0005902627,0.001782481,0.03936329,0.01903055,0.002620674,0.003846881,0.002407914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07936103,0.0004378953,0.0003089784,0.001466028,0.05493417,0.01044207,0.01565017,0.006181543,0.000233953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02943973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07224239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3984515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5040814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.929917,0.04664937,0.0009474818,0.002566879,0.01204026,0.00787899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510982,0.02381351,0.004801336,0.003872524,0.01020816,0.006206302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005713742,0.00004365418,0.01071065,0.00006012591,0.00002384383,0.0006041094,0.6515687,0.0003584839,0.0005997941,0.292482,0.007782983,0.03570861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003700166,0.0001132969,0.01558903,0.0004136904,0.00007162201,0.0003934153,0.5942093,0.001132607,0.001057196,0.1989028,0.1879243,0.0001557438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5553308,0.003562758,0.01687509,0.1534849,0.0006766712,0.0001564096,0.00007885331,0.00006037492,0.269774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918793,0.000426992,0.0007589569,0.002154485,0.0001034965,0.00001825289,0.0000091072,0.00001438034,0.004635107],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3984515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7922646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02599722008452153,"score_gpt":0.3305702768228269,"score_spread":0.3045730567383053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}