{"id":"W2802153528","doi":"10.5931/djim.v14i0.7872","title":"Peering into the Private Lives of Judges: Reconciling Judicial Accountability and Privacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Diversity (politics); Public interest; Judicial review; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001740463,0.0001126734,0.00025268,0.0001036771,0.001024683,0.00005590073,0.0004577179,0.00003112001,0.00005815188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001186932,0.00007711026,0.0001074534,0.0002157394,0.001479256,0.000292141,0.001162808,0.0001460826,0.000005309033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001186729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006298388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002843869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00102301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985615,0.0001099388,0.0005216218,0.0001482825,0.000464738,0.0001939265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989974,0.0001276816,0.0003676826,0.0001412395,0.0003034935,0.00006253945],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001110987,0.0004322304,0.03563707,0.0001968248,0.001175075,0.00007274273,0.7389859,0.00005212148,0.0004102328,0.07213517,0.002122598,0.1476691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001363682,0.001469299,0.1631369,0.001211611,0.0005299963,0.00005050189,0.5411701,0.00009018224,0.0004669692,0.2357877,0.05411169,0.0006113139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498086,0.0005844625,0.0006139752,0.003222193,0.0006836866,0.0002016181,0.000001547046,0.00001270822,0.04487121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978672,0.0003682387,0.0008049743,0.00009965382,0.0007890579,0.000003728667,2.63826e-7,0.000005503858,0.0000614369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1978158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7881134,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02599722008452153,"score_gpt":0.3305702768228269,"score_spread":0.3045730567383053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}