{"id":"W2802165003","doi":"10.1080/07011784.2018.1459863","title":"Pocket wetlands as additions to stormwater treatment train systems: a case study from a restored stream in Brampton, ON, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Credit Valley Hospital","funders":"Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Tributary; Stormwater; Wetland; Water quality; Urban stream; Stream restoration; Surface runoff; Channel (broadcasting); Baseflow; Habitat; Streamflow; Geography; Drainage basin; Ecology; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004494024,0.0003632732,0.0002823055,0.0005868602,0.00571637,0.001258507,0.001110569,0.0006383522,0.001234118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009293159,0.0002691823,0.0003059586,0.001195797,0.001386649,0.0003512967,0.000809507,0.0008667083,0.0001091123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03288756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0335596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992137,0.00009282144,0.00001945829,0.00006300939,0.0003041681,0.0003067737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921,0.00007716974,0.00007623847,0.00002599941,0.0003241641,0.0002864083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005474834,0.001891956,0.7166209,0.0005000363,0.0001339307,0.05497709,0.07956986,0.008327396,0.0127248,0.004163235,0.01216126,0.1083821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006453505,0.00103008,0.7763759,0.0002296715,0.00009075593,0.004213955,0.1753454,0.005771561,0.002140361,0.0004011387,0.03425548,0.00008114991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963295,0.0001028659,0.0002045242,0.0002658404,0.000006169684,0.00009769281,0.0001083942,0.000008208952,0.00287677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940702,0.0003898349,0.0009061203,0.0001464194,0.00000467372,0.00003006193,0.0001312908,0.00000813437,0.004313288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03288756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2386171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01690291166753198,"score_gpt":0.2124716252449312,"score_spread":0.1955687135773992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}