{"id":"W2802324234","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.11.012","title":"Eye care utilisation in Newfoundland and Labrador: access barriers and vision health outcomes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Socioeconomic status; Eye care; Cataracts; Glaucoma; Optometry; Visual impairment; Eye examination; Health care; Demography; Family medicine; Cross-sectional study; Gerontology; Environmental health; Ophthalmology; Visual acuity; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003266369,0.0001248294,0.000433895,0.000417582,0.0002026339,0.00002369394,0.00007387594,0.0001173521,0.0002542664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002394633,0.0001022255,0.00003213931,0.0001272789,0.0004751634,0.0001812268,0.00002706075,0.0002130897,0.000001873933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007326059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01266524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005168143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990298,0.0001149324,0.0003242814,0.0001542558,0.00007488251,0.0003018866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988886,0.00006254482,0.0001542836,0.00009123922,0.0001455323,0.0006577623],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001068006,0.0000131387,0.9941122,0.00006622043,0.00004144481,0.001717229,0.003035649,2.944881e-7,0.000005127865,0.00004884234,0.0001540475,0.0006989927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001350109,0.00394934,0.9684372,0.0001035952,0.0000229236,0.02369509,0.001986425,0.00000677668,0.000003721002,0.0001719916,0.0001985627,0.00007429052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916442,0.002282721,0.000001978215,0.004219581,0.0004075025,0.000156353,0.000007306766,0.000001997221,0.001278377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.00003206313,0.00008931601,0.0003645371,0.00009664294,0.000001530045,0.000003148058,0.00000991162,0.0001431221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02567504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939095,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03757268080140366,"score_gpt":0.4126182748354179,"score_spread":0.3750455940340143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}