{"id":"W2802441775","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2013-0087","title":"USING ADAMS FOR MECHANISM SIMULATION APPLICATION OF MULTIAXIS MACHINES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Kinematics; Computer science; Transient (computer programming); Motion simulation; Control engineering; Mechanism design; Conceptual design; Machine tool; Simulation; Engineering drawing; Mechanical engineering; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Physics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006903431,0.000681654,0.0005512696,0.0006481468,0.0003826002,0.0006495326,0.001362578,0.0006318631,0.01381303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001341349,0.0004287776,0.0006076295,0.0004969545,0.0002148962,0.0005622279,0.0006997902,0.000793883,0.002103884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002620774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006504296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002617565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002258365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995815,0.00008953261,0.00003542517,0.00003379655,0.0002284025,0.0000313837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994528,0.0001902486,0.00004721278,0.00008520032,0.0001930273,0.000031585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004085688,0.0001657925,0.003835565,0.0008133551,0.000134631,0.0008960539,0.000591379,0.6950809,0.0477883,0.06543145,0.01523669,0.1696173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008556584,0.00005794486,0.0003336869,0.0000324601,0.00001684784,0.0001205227,0.00003253433,0.9485442,0.01014915,0.002673804,0.03793382,0.00001941609],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01908289,0.0001476409,0.9568311,0.0001238628,0.000168742,0.0001920233,0.0008128546,0.01118222,0.01145868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3756006,0.0004873346,0.6082225,0.00005828158,0.00005908523,0.0009498144,0.00134033,0.001679055,0.01160289],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01381303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04620928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0133757404118877,"score_gpt":0.2185612910798209,"score_spread":0.2051855506679333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}