{"id":"W2802698290","doi":"10.1139/er-2018-0004","title":"Radiological impact assessment approaches for Life Cycle Assessment: a review and possible ways forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Impact assessment; Life-cycle assessment; Damages; Risk analysis (engineering); Radiological weapon; Risk assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Computer science; Business; Production (economics); Economics; Medicine; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003116692,0.00161573,0.00206505,0.007671775,0.0005689223,0.002899715,0.001797785,0.001845691,0.004785957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004173192,0.0006598454,0.001536936,0.01020436,0.001286905,0.003779652,0.001121856,0.00254162,0.001665191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002407829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004346703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003560878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986184,0.0003857885,0.0002374548,0.0001622129,0.0005330717,0.00006310151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951699,0.003135861,0.0005313211,0.0001318174,0.0009455307,0.00008550051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000443121,0.0001073323,0.0003157853,0.08233969,0.0002185566,0.0002474157,0.0004250464,0.001797843,0.00155342,0.02864235,0.02225995,0.8620483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006714606,0.00009336334,0.0007626495,0.02205815,0.0002070541,0.0006513993,0.0003232817,0.0002817436,0.000577605,0.00928851,0.9657023,0.0000472343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000109277,0.9969446,0.0008516086,0.0004200556,0.0001746804,0.0000144192,0.00002503436,0.00001107153,0.001449212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008704459,0.997223,0.001256514,0.0001667931,0.00009570627,0.00001753228,0.0000262542,0.000003715131,0.0003400867],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007671775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01747012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0971210418624779,"score_gpt":0.3432068592815559,"score_spread":0.246085817419078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}