{"id":"W2802698290","doi":"10.1139/er-2018-0004","title":"Radiological impact assessment approaches for Life Cycle Assessment: a review and possible ways forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Impact assessment; Life-cycle assessment; Damages; Risk analysis (engineering); Radiological weapon; Risk assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Computer science; Business; Production (economics); Economics; Medicine; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009279641,0.0008971836,0.003956338,0.0000784405,0.0002079729,0.00005862092,0.0003179762,0.0002782069,0.0001615125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005228295,0.0005810668,0.001290862,0.0001232256,0.0001963483,0.0001637018,0.0001811009,0.0005034885,0.0001360252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000588284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000386781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.387419e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.382432e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973881,0.0002213501,0.0009743315,0.0006701167,0.000199132,0.0005470079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986511,0.000192688,0.0003022483,0.0005674729,0.000001227597,0.0002852173],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001081417,0.00008075443,0.00001047409,0.04408477,0.0006329687,0.000001790515,0.00002020412,0.000002687877,4.147225e-7,0.00002117416,0.0214047,0.933739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000165393,0.000197053,0.0001291579,0.008550224,0.002354084,0.0000536295,0.000008496469,0.0003063371,5.60216e-8,0.00003020615,0.9875787,0.000626601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005559426,0.9918442,0.00118564,0.00002499369,0.0001720756,0.004360096,0.0001802699,0.00009455785,0.002132656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00002845182,0.9927232,0.004930626,0.0000978668,0.0003050722,0.001419104,0.000260063,0.0001388976,0.00009672171],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0971210418624779,"score_gpt":0.3432068592815559,"score_spread":0.246085817419078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}