{"id":"W2803097171","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12582","title":"INEQUALITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL‐BEING AS A COMPREHENSIVE MEASURE OF INEQUALITY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Happiness; Inequality; Index (typography); Economics; Income inequality metrics; Economic inequality; Measure (data warehouse); Scale (ratio); Econometrics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008514504,0.0001918539,0.0005179096,0.0001213831,0.00007196259,0.00000749936,0.0002184937,0.0002518911,0.00379184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001018349,0.0001880126,0.0001542107,0.000113491,0.0006504582,0.00009632432,0.00006123024,0.0002314682,0.001285576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009815657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004966986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001667469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000539635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977832,0.0005678261,0.000772064,0.0004862314,0.0001072145,0.0002834243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982473,0.000352491,0.0005533227,0.0006129927,0.0001525325,0.00008132416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005060416,0.001198025,0.5995588,0.000214619,0.001710227,0.00002007417,0.1037117,0.00007058594,0.0128122,0.2052635,0.03901069,0.03136904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002256911,0.00131959,0.9370548,0.0001081071,0.000063542,0.00002538109,0.006597938,0.0000368209,0.01114662,0.0306052,0.01029632,0.0004887391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8563893,0.00006764635,0.000342542,0.00008569287,0.004855681,0.0001885533,0.00002159692,0.00004854493,0.1380004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979237,0.00000682073,0.00007930308,0.0003801531,0.001282575,0.00001494746,0.00001106871,0.00001833677,0.000283135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.337496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07624152352977362,"score_gpt":0.3737692870480873,"score_spread":0.2975277635183137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}