{"id":"W2803800390","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.05.011","title":"Determining loads acting on the pelvis in upright and recumbent birthing positions: A case study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biomechanics","topic":"Pregnancy-related medical research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Squatting position; Supine position; Pelvis; Lumbosacral joint; Medicine; Childbirth; Inverse dynamics; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Sagittal plane; Biomechanics; Sacrum; Pelvic tilt; Orthodontics; Physical therapy; Anatomy; Pregnancy; Surgery; Physics; Kinematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005199183,0.001672849,0.0008836582,0.003869534,0.002388734,0.001259572,0.001657865,0.004163031,0.004504337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004974657,0.00152005,0.001016278,0.001434379,0.003010144,0.0009627132,0.001509534,0.002021993,0.001045409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001041519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008119792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002836771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004301632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990529,0.000169634,0.0000967179,0.0001827044,0.0002457987,0.0002521583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985924,0.0006760107,0.0002314289,0.000124192,0.000112106,0.0002637894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001386067,0.0002911288,0.04938787,0.0000762276,0.00001756145,0.9367023,0.00301071,0.0001539272,0.003124007,0.0002125731,0.0001903809,0.006694758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009984195,0.0003036331,0.02440055,0.00003641216,0.00003509992,0.9689127,0.003169579,0.0003975545,0.001671408,0.000257071,0.0007758748,0.00003014868],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993985,0.0006941317,0.001923895,0.0003934812,0.00004969277,0.00009240021,0.00007907073,0.00002137453,0.002760994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958242,0.0007502196,0.001427841,0.0001249975,0.00008712345,0.0000146439,0.00003869849,0.00002116589,0.00171113],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004504337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01506847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1604870591920132,"score_gpt":0.4748940981217158,"score_spread":0.3144070389297026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}