{"id":"W2803890401","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.05.007","title":"Meta-analysis based predictions of flood insurance and flood vulnerability patterns in Calgary, Alberta","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Geography","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; McMaster University","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flood insurance; Flood myth; Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Socioeconomic status; Social vulnerability; Natural hazard; Flooding (psychology); Business; Environmental planning; Actuarial science; Population; Psychological intervention; Demography; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299225,0.001087694,0.001913964,0.003024842,0.0007122359,0.001958528,0.002143357,0.0009322491,0.001850645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01366389,0.0006394677,0.005189695,0.003767989,0.0005419142,0.0004504031,0.0009811911,0.001177204,0.0001556804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005418752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007071833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6999832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7323225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969395,0.001994493,0.0002202515,0.0004275863,0.0002421067,0.0001761493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880506,0.008808321,0.0006749363,0.0009380805,0.001141222,0.000386894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006326669,0.0001027653,0.6359168,0.001549563,0.1832316,0.0008153679,0.0003663635,0.1393036,0.0006715771,0.002036177,0.005322209,0.02435728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001496234,0.000404434,0.5453246,0.001738251,0.2104713,0.0004893554,0.001036628,0.2216052,0.0007431455,0.007125911,0.00932931,0.0002356493],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289482,0.05095932,0.006285583,0.002256806,0.000301963,0.00006557193,0.008995944,0.0002222882,0.001964284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913113,0.003775996,0.002037561,0.0001540061,0.00004279137,0.00002906353,0.002032164,0.00003173731,0.0005852628],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3000168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6035674,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01561687439238125,"score_gpt":0.2346115835493774,"score_spread":0.2189947091569961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}