{"id":"W2804284364","doi":"10.1002/jocb.349","title":"Specificity and Abstraction of Examples: Opposite Effects on Fixation for Creative Ideation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Creative Behavior","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Categorization; Ideation; Fixation (population genetics); Abstraction; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Creativity; Task (project management); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Engineering; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009319187,0.0003795546,0.0003002243,0.000301309,0.0002482987,0.0006773359,0.0003840802,0.0007185216,0.003963113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01266549,0.0002892036,0.0001822698,0.0001350991,0.0006892633,0.0006676574,0.0009172776,0.0009006329,0.0002180287],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002970919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002185484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005409649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006139591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990537,0.000284908,0.00004999373,0.0001968853,0.0003172092,0.00009742161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878829,0.009100936,0.001560536,0.0005513863,0.0003711291,0.0005331996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003986699,0.0007580885,0.02291295,0.0004750878,0.00006443076,0.0003361714,0.00451043,0.0003408385,0.9247096,0.00112204,0.0004812515,0.04030243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003802199,0.004855643,0.8501586,0.0003279081,0.0002484985,0.001071727,0.002379271,0.002726141,0.1302271,0.00421621,0.003295251,0.0001133414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952177,0.000193506,0.001654759,0.0000786968,0.00001712877,0.00002103004,0.00002184131,0.00003743351,0.002757961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967144,0.00009140808,0.002413996,0.00006966785,0.000006701256,0.00005551763,0.0000305015,0.00003492212,0.0005829277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003963113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01325792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07050124183971075,"score_gpt":0.4066111147554406,"score_spread":0.3361098729157299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}