{"id":"W2804284364","doi":"10.1002/jocb.349","title":"Specificity and Abstraction of Examples: Opposite Effects on Fixation for Creative Ideation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Creative Behavior","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Categorization; Ideation; Fixation (population genetics); Abstraction; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Creativity; Task (project management); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Engineering; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000731586,0.0001107189,0.0001972,0.0001502417,0.0001711405,0.00001991806,0.000122122,0.00005336002,0.0001746803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003272787,0.00007547595,0.0000605468,0.0001500549,0.0003107175,0.000183874,0.00001003563,0.0001333344,0.000009649144],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004962143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003604968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008607491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001479076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99894,0.0002833166,0.0003302359,0.0001228801,0.0002086412,0.000114929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974288,0.001156855,0.0007277129,0.0001553507,0.0004749805,0.00005632149],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006709835,0.002549559,0.05059005,0.00006087243,0.00016048,0.000006376134,0.0567515,0.00001444558,0.7454422,0.0106409,0.004301112,0.1227726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000649069,0.002633993,0.8351218,0.00006376167,0.0002123593,0.00004473099,0.002692391,0.000008134443,0.157937,0.0002636162,0.0003061486,0.00006709628],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917205,0.0000399048,0.004954697,0.0002068621,0.000575122,0.0005027583,0.00001664767,0.000008632463,0.001974877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985984,0.0000291777,0.0002758935,0.00007239843,0.0002883235,0.00002439786,0.000001739517,0.00001207072,0.0006976278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7845317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.307782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07050124183971075,"score_gpt":0.4066111147554406,"score_spread":0.3361098729157299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}