{"id":"W2804397414","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12453","title":"Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi‐Case Discourse Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fondation HEC","keywords":"Legitimacy; Framing (construction); Narrative; Political science; Morality; Representation (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Narrative inquiry; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; History; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02443731,0.0006923606,0.0006434295,0.01269809,0.008937228,0.01031379,0.002247681,0.002959781,0.003527988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04389095,0.0005802214,0.0005035376,0.008334868,0.01143519,0.01053783,0.006680081,0.002561894,0.000338516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009489454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003170016,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009701849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009022803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9799262,0.01477492,0.0008989532,0.0009842123,0.002315094,0.001100697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8816825,0.107946,0.004053404,0.001971941,0.003482839,0.0008633465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006439359,0.0001118762,0.009388842,0.0002836728,0.00001756201,0.002411424,0.9446301,0.0002238135,0.001309176,0.03019351,0.0008021264,0.01056351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001248244,0.00003449109,0.006985609,0.0004812372,0.00002254772,0.0004602458,0.9623222,0.002257682,0.001859982,0.008353933,0.01717947,0.00003016037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9700524,0.0005544981,0.008192024,0.002839727,0.00004173686,0.0006011415,0.0004217347,0.00002083231,0.01727597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916544,0.0003800902,0.005426608,0.0001178933,0.0000250839,0.0003458313,0.0002378635,0.00002431966,0.001787828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02443731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1292384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5083382174364347,"score_gpt":0.5726616260037786,"score_spread":0.06432340856734386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}