{"id":"W2804397414","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12453","title":"Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi‐Case Discourse Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fondation HEC","keywords":"Legitimacy; Framing (construction); Narrative; Political science; Morality; Representation (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Narrative inquiry; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; History; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03347338,0.000136033,0.0003380345,0.001295637,0.00132451,0.0008759368,0.001599882,0.0001087137,0.0003978513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02826327,0.00008294605,0.000204122,0.007151469,0.002093975,0.00104776,0.0005451224,0.0006155645,0.0001176853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000493468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007465887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002184974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005446087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949025,0.000790056,0.0008238644,0.0006097501,0.002443964,0.0004298665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829924,0.009593222,0.0004331616,0.001582601,0.00530164,0.0000969873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000388124,0.001021005,0.7208205,0.000109917,0.0009026707,0.0003418479,0.04191157,0.0001942279,0.00692297,0.08079989,0.0928975,0.05368979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003420118,0.000582354,0.2294554,0.001006264,0.0004618251,0.0003393884,0.2466224,0.1495835,0.01010401,0.217454,0.1389856,0.001985026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614519,0.0005815126,0.018478,0.007867304,0.0006394127,0.0003402261,0.00001678284,0.00002773768,0.01059709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958819,0.000008530601,0.002005561,0.0001019002,0.0005118355,0.00002432575,0.000003833055,0.00001513496,0.001447015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.491365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5083382174364347,"score_gpt":0.5726616260037786,"score_spread":0.06432340856734386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}