{"id":"W2804456142","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.088","title":"Solar energy justice: A case-study analysis of Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Energy","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Economic Justice; Stakeholder engagement; Process (computing); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Corporation; Energy (signal processing); Solar energy; Political science; Procedural justice; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Physics; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001592932,0.000473214,0.0007819769,0.00336679,0.01451798,0.003545696,0.002349385,0.00141148,0.003656065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004551205,0.0004784204,0.0006155851,0.009968259,0.002967395,0.001097861,0.002977932,0.001549177,0.0002909637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0761826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1110697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973472,0.0005359073,0.00009257528,0.000218625,0.0005674066,0.001238195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948654,0.001286043,0.0005068591,0.0002274612,0.002181726,0.0009325541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005438757,0.001311908,0.8209221,0.0003929111,0.0003355508,0.01376957,0.09551015,0.001840181,0.001693286,0.008410711,0.007778865,0.04749103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004889099,0.0001663487,0.5826279,0.0003065784,0.0001526235,0.001016285,0.4008796,0.00156406,0.0006966266,0.0006376634,0.01180508,0.00009841446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906127,0.0003840179,0.0001854017,0.0005564907,0.00001049361,0.0001730888,0.0005048228,0.000006277664,0.007566685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945193,0.0006338575,0.000381313,0.0002734681,0.000004114025,0.00007454381,0.0002861573,0.00001005518,0.003817147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0761826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.552746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01242798775753561,"score_gpt":0.2662259056990013,"score_spread":0.2537979179414657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}