{"id":"W2804456142","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.088","title":"Solar energy justice: A case-study analysis of Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Energy","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Economic Justice; Stakeholder engagement; Process (computing); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Corporation; Energy (signal processing); Solar energy; Political science; Procedural justice; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Physics; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003640695,0.0002359666,0.0005797084,0.0002625467,0.0008612542,0.00004799096,0.0005162312,0.0001675455,0.0006290979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005528366,0.0002532281,0.0001426984,0.003104382,0.0004314288,0.00008952215,0.0001063129,0.00007152019,0.000001691125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003796956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001702342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974207,0.0001721346,0.0004422003,0.0004930897,0.0008542811,0.0006175669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984549,0.0002393309,0.0002788973,0.000480175,0.0002932107,0.0002534944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002606346,0.002007825,0.006095063,0.00003679098,0.0115957,0.002170888,0.1372037,0.01345002,0.002951718,0.3650967,0.04642605,0.4127049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005805202,0.0001252904,0.0003753236,0.000004390844,0.002932118,0.000004333712,0.8378264,0.0003628627,0.002778397,0.0009839843,0.1533853,0.0006410345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8911984,0.000100281,0.002983079,0.0001230571,0.0008371377,0.0001078449,0.00001884128,0.0001282089,0.1045032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943994,0.00002537708,0.0003082424,0.0005120886,0.0009216124,0.00006615613,0.00001354396,0.00003024842,0.003723387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7006227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01242798775753561,"score_gpt":0.2662259056990013,"score_spread":0.2537979179414657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}