{"id":"W2805076395","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.068","title":"Comparing the relative mitigation potential of individual pro-environmental behaviors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Environmental science; Climate change mitigation; Natural resource economics; Global warming; Consumption (sociology); Environmental protection; Business; Environmental engineering; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009084447,0.00008932605,0.0001218782,0.00003997542,0.0001779525,0.00001629271,0.0001983811,0.00004258027,0.0007120625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007837294,0.00006375954,0.00008009381,0.0001035995,0.0008191782,0.0005661471,0.00008974092,0.0002133246,0.00003187764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000257783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001495881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001759236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006457277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985885,0.000147136,0.0004239993,0.0001540514,0.0005627093,0.0001235825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.00001396339,0.0004995895,0.0001784304,0.00001841317,0.00005428516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002071754,0.0008843843,0.8782454,0.00001209215,0.0000570164,0.000002530356,0.01187783,0.003859291,0.08193295,0.00004428054,0.003339489,0.01953756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002190807,0.0002659275,0.9622267,0.000008818459,0.00007248013,0.00008411132,0.004765411,0.00006532708,0.02995022,0.0006358615,0.001629491,0.0000765093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975098,0.00001890615,0.0002282955,0.00106242,0.0004987026,0.0002037212,0.000001156623,0.000004201932,0.0004728121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986044,0.000009073206,0.0006300784,0.00004537734,0.0002951722,0.000002649472,0.000003202605,0.000008108988,0.0004020088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08398136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7796586,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01258153902836963,"score_gpt":0.2515957761704632,"score_spread":0.2390142371420936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}