{"id":"W2805265685","doi":"10.17118/11143/12322","title":"De l’expertise «forensique» et de la décision judiciaire : domaines fertiles pour un effort de compréhension et de cohérence","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001557234,0.0004426334,0.0007058344,0.0002716969,0.0006810792,0.00006275255,0.0004187551,0.0005691244,0.0003297816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005618227,0.0004925061,0.0003468556,0.000602081,0.0005173862,0.0001597016,0.0003036768,0.0007113538,0.0001053892],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01106237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965819,0.0005239433,0.0004264582,0.0006576104,0.0003922639,0.001417882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974442,0.0007902779,0.0001638509,0.000500284,0.0001953039,0.0009061293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003325234,0.002018661,0.4364973,0.00168017,0.0007368086,0.03735456,0.06282812,0.006444294,0.1845334,0.07232761,0.137562,0.05469193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004561249,0.0005911558,0.3317998,0.00560624,0.001012751,0.006231621,0.002984576,0.02626913,0.008739187,0.0118732,0.5992075,0.001123535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956967,0.01288845,0.02235799,0.004612028,0.0005735904,0.0003407696,0.0000299209,0.0001895133,0.06331105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902641,0.01328313,0.01040979,0.002871422,0.0005596401,0.00001124228,0.00003407171,0.00008172446,0.08248488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4616456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01245647039545712,"score_gpt":0.2469803126889204,"score_spread":0.2345238422934633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}