{"id":"W2805484995","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v11n3p158","title":"Is Plastic Bag Ordinance Effective? Evidence from Carbon Emissions in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beijing; Hindsight bias; China; Plastic bag; Greenhouse gas; Population; Carbon dioxide; Carbon fibers; Consumption (sociology); Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Business; Waste management; Economics; Law; Engineering; Environmental health; Political science; Chemistry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048173,0.0002324113,0.000330128,0.0001293858,0.0001978084,0.00004323494,0.0003950175,0.00009732196,0.001359979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008288483,0.0001908634,0.00007097658,0.0005105598,0.0002717932,0.0006461044,0.000401108,0.0003285605,0.00004946096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003320796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002000625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00135725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007572752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977345,0.0001268317,0.0006159107,0.0003175493,0.0005934431,0.0006117852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989366,0.000213586,0.0003012644,0.0002443577,0.00004811573,0.0002560577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002789372,0.0002821022,0.9763051,0.00004409309,0.00002710376,0.0005356306,0.01234015,0.0003699225,0.004972369,0.000005993157,0.0005816877,0.004256901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005481692,0.0002954838,0.9771325,0.0001902608,0.0000140007,0.00001912642,0.003205,0.0003023645,0.01292094,0.0007029157,0.00443708,0.0002321418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997466,0.0002193457,0.0003365318,0.0003305444,0.0001626116,0.0003492578,5.543822e-7,0.000008396619,0.001126734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953046,0.00004721604,0.002627864,0.00008696087,0.00007585912,0.00001710886,4.579924e-7,0.00001639105,0.001823571],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009135152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007164095958058861,"score_gpt":0.2413731470502497,"score_spread":0.2342090510921908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}