{"id":"W2805708151","doi":"10.1038/s41598-018-19354-6","title":"Capturing expert uncertainty in spatial cumulative impact assessments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Adelaide; South Australian Research and Development Institute; Flinders University; Government of South Australia","keywords":"Impact assessment; Cumulative effects; Computer science; Expert elicitation; Cumulative distribution function; Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Environmental science; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Probability density function","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008116849,0.0001358727,0.0001222656,0.00008165224,0.0001876875,0.0001438282,0.0001426809,0.00002774997,0.004224338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004109215,0.0001081202,0.00006164672,0.0004061702,0.0003503967,0.0002630588,0.001532807,0.00007021642,0.0002099885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003729466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002523628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02016346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008466783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980747,0.00003503566,0.0003119054,0.0006705425,0.0005417904,0.0003660192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00001048182,0.0001324315,0.0005033629,0.0000156607,0.0001082189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008788084,0.0006232665,0.4093835,0.00001482018,0.00003591975,0.00140477,0.0049838,0.01414235,0.02410675,0.00005867693,0.07787953,0.4672787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008418218,0.0004055812,0.7065797,0.00008258562,0.0000204392,0.0001175779,0.0007188782,0.03028945,0.008849887,0.05969007,0.1913043,0.001099643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8962417,0.000004323728,0.0005913766,0.00007901653,0.002641852,0.0002861689,8.594694e-7,0.00003654949,0.1001182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934593,6.082131e-7,0.000240591,0.00004106455,0.00006822823,0.00001613276,0.00001403375,0.000007899834,0.006152088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.466179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966859,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01828599833850038,"score_gpt":0.3069527321786454,"score_spread":0.2886667338401451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}