{"id":"W2805708151","doi":"10.1038/s41598-018-19354-6","title":"Capturing expert uncertainty in spatial cumulative impact assessments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Adelaide; South Australian Research and Development Institute; Flinders University; Government of South Australia","keywords":"Impact assessment; Cumulative effects; Computer science; Expert elicitation; Cumulative distribution function; Environmental resource management; Baseline (sea); Environmental science; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Probability density function","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02498072,0.001225102,0.0009494888,0.004608271,0.0007589173,0.003070043,0.001913511,0.001702889,0.002891472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1087445,0.0007701797,0.001179321,0.003084345,0.001168835,0.003398839,0.003358356,0.001325474,0.0002868398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002232554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001872287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01597387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9834419,0.01035397,0.000930613,0.001621903,0.003048955,0.0006027258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8456043,0.1376766,0.005740369,0.004661465,0.005534871,0.0007823835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002820495,0.00009917851,0.02354991,0.0003198429,0.0002958592,0.000274415,0.001520357,0.8720548,0.0010146,0.01171461,0.001130739,0.08774358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004636545,0.0001139829,0.009443627,0.0002100634,0.0001302958,0.000144495,0.001028734,0.9222844,0.001788184,0.06196354,0.00272537,0.0001209628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2718681,0.0003609353,0.7135417,0.0005313507,0.00004315229,0.0002723219,0.001064802,0.0003636268,0.01195397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548465,0.0001795834,0.1434878,0.0001087832,0.00003553376,0.0002559602,0.0005862844,0.00004409319,0.0004553864],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02498072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1321123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01828599833850038,"score_gpt":0.3069527321786454,"score_spread":0.2886667338401451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}