{"id":"W2805784521","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v11n3p135","title":"Valuing Environmental Public Goods: Deliberative Citizen Juries as a Non-Rational Persuasion Method","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Preference; Persuasion; Jury; Matching (statistics); Sample (material); Population; Control (management); Public good; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Demography; Statistics; Law; Mathematics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1062405,0.0006527817,0.001357366,0.001355703,0.002064929,0.004376218,0.001838496,0.002438669,0.006991229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2154888,0.0006127522,0.000768854,0.001062961,0.004875098,0.003733034,0.003780499,0.002693047,0.0008229292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001699656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002353771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006216784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008513944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8041597,0.1779169,0.002831003,0.004096379,0.009437258,0.001558726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6858771,0.2713242,0.01839081,0.01800291,0.004806191,0.00159873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009688138,0.007605798,0.05279491,0.002155167,0.001254748,0.0007805304,0.05407769,0.02425669,0.02185496,0.4211729,0.006751501,0.397607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003768099,0.009656249,0.05303921,0.0008736411,0.0007761593,0.0005543639,0.02021945,0.1484067,0.02250393,0.7052526,0.03425247,0.0006970883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7682533,0.0003709914,0.1685844,0.007484489,0.0002356284,0.003928759,0.0001393482,0.0002077594,0.05079539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489,0.00008463103,0.04555524,0.0006042222,0.00006252864,0.002165229,0.00002844694,0.00001934348,0.002580329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5618603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04980248889232976,"score_gpt":0.2405362019928654,"score_spread":0.1907337131005356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}