{"id":"W2805969641","doi":"10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x","title":"Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health; University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario; Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Construct validity; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychology; Danish; Psychometrics; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Statistics; Structural equation modeling; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003117491,0.00009030447,0.0002149482,0.00006228816,0.0006303462,0.000008982272,0.0001885876,0.0001134092,0.00003474321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111007,0.00005131528,0.0001291715,0.0004016049,0.0002739744,0.0002832818,0.00006935923,0.0002409151,0.000001594085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002618073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005892444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005517995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005209397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975128,0.0005965742,0.001072558,0.0001361513,0.000518523,0.0001633554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916428,0.003091075,0.001197943,0.000230586,0.003750983,0.00008659974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002448614,0.00005346275,0.9809574,0.000363573,0.000009906391,1.662801e-8,0.008177686,0.0003745187,0.000457961,0.0009413403,0.004334859,0.001880641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008641665,0.0005155579,0.9873157,0.0006291278,0.00002482083,8.240589e-7,0.001662729,0.000225868,0.0004036108,0.004707797,0.003600086,0.00004970638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905127,0.00001196719,0.001088883,0.005897352,0.001350153,0.000989172,0.00003292411,0.000003477393,0.0001133349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911216,0.00000384393,0.008180076,0.0002662886,0.0002931334,0.00001724369,0.000004639418,0.000007181744,0.0001060106],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00798321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05856812737298889,"score_gpt":0.4264876244392443,"score_spread":0.3679194970662554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}