{"id":"W2806246871","doi":"10.1017/jfm.2018.326","title":"The modified Myers boundary condition for swirling flow","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Blasius boundary layer; Boundary layer; No-slip condition; Boundary layer thickness; Inviscid flow; Boundary (topology); External flow; Flow (mathematics); Boundary value problem; Boundary layer control; Mechanics; Different types of boundary conditions in fluid dynamics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008259179,0.0009045381,0.0006231332,0.0008483996,0.0008775878,0.001274819,0.001369329,0.001660176,0.006872072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003942844,0.0004168738,0.0004307934,0.0003239231,0.001339942,0.002501195,0.001338843,0.001244342,0.001979023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006376809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009732809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001890546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001398357,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991597,0.0001347399,0.00006515421,0.0001298467,0.0004095399,0.0001010366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992656,0.0002496043,0.0001116736,0.00008681123,0.0002369717,0.00004938577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005392772,0.00007015748,0.00116702,0.0005592954,0.00002208131,0.001245004,0.0004870259,0.04879644,0.2149681,0.6398985,0.009518027,0.08272908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002574461,0.0005369958,0.002709346,0.0002954459,0.00004999652,0.001902395,0.0003581936,0.5581465,0.1467265,0.1592718,0.1294157,0.000329583],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05778062,0.001022991,0.8939328,0.0006806047,0.0007896338,0.0002694856,0.0003114881,0.0006236702,0.04458866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6258715,0.0009476473,0.3402646,0.000682304,0.0004776451,0.0005672367,0.0004966258,0.0006976213,0.02999484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006872072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02298933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009596331447796303,"score_gpt":0.2332470896986253,"score_spread":0.223650758250829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}