{"id":"W2806456340","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.024","title":"Neuroprotection by anaesthetics in rodent models of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"British Journal of Anaesthesia","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission; University of Leicester; University of Calgary","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Neuroprotection; Confidence interval; Sample size determination; Medicine; Statistical power; Publication bias; Traumatic brain injury; Rodent model; Study heterogeneity; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Statistics; Psychiatry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005234696,0.002362076,0.01616115,0.003871748,0.0005548976,0.00245716,0.00184345,0.002138919,0.004478579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01708956,0.001115118,0.02126309,0.005041583,0.0006694465,0.00152213,0.001466592,0.001855716,0.0004115581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002649878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006300351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02115661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965926,0.0009682578,0.001381662,0.0004699466,0.0004167937,0.0001707024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919283,0.00527795,0.001818131,0.0003044412,0.0005471501,0.0001239228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002631077,0.00005215174,0.002691713,0.5461975,0.4293669,0.0001208502,0.0001179076,0.0003349432,0.0003672923,0.0001227124,0.0006273593,0.01736942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000792,0.0002432795,0.003956886,0.02705188,0.9652071,0.0001228223,0.00006283603,0.0000794969,0.0001039109,0.0001710362,0.002177125,0.00003160468],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004666923,0.9940051,0.0003370537,0.00009399676,0.000098816,0.0001887431,0.0004143197,0.00001497139,0.0001799835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1078061,0.8880945,0.001629926,0.0007597879,0.0001485172,0.000527627,0.0006385575,0.00002467994,0.0003702668],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01616115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02768409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0786135987608233,"score_gpt":0.3227377992602607,"score_spread":0.2441242004994374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}